Do “Culture Heroes†Exist? A Dialogue With Luc de Heusch on the Limits of the Structuralist Approach to Myth

Manuela Palmeirim

SAGE Open, 2016, vol. 6, issue 2, 2158244016649013

Abstract: This article argues the inadequacy of the structuralist framework of analysis as applied to Central African myths of foundation and tries to demonstrate that a dichotomous approach can inhibit the full understanding of these narratives, often misrepresenting and curtailing their meaning. Instead, it is claimed that blurredness, ambiguity, “consubstantiality,†and fluidity are, in Central Africa, the assortment of logical and symbolic instruments able to convey, as well as constantly recreate, the prodigious intricacy of meanings that emanate from mythological thinking.

Keywords: structuralism; concept of “oppositionâ€; myths of foundation; Central Africa (DRC); Aruwund (Lunda of the Mwant Yaav) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244016649013 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:sagope:v:6:y:2016:i:2:p:2158244016649013

DOI: 10.1177/2158244016649013

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in SAGE Open
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().