Mastering the Journey to Continuous Compliance

Kimberly Hanna, Judy Duvall, Rebecca L. Turpin, Katherine Pendleton-Romig and Sherrie Parker

SAGE Open, 2016, vol. 6, issue 2, 2158244016656231

Abstract: The accreditation process of a nursing program requires self-assessment, peer evaluation, and identifying areas of improvement. In 2008, the Commission on Collegiate Nursing Education (CCNE) began offering a 10-year accreditation with a Continuous Improvement Progress Report (CIPR) at the fifth year. This article focuses on an in-depth analysis of a system in which the school of nursing utilized an ad hoc committee to complete the CIPR. Reports generated by the ad hoc committee concluded that need for improvement was warranted related to policy review. An action plan for continuous compliance generated implementation of policy software and the creation of an academic support specialist position. An ad hoc committee completed the CIPR rather than paying faculty overload hours; policy was an exemplar. Faculty development, team performance, and accountability resulted in a plan for continual compliance that can be adopted in other nursing schools to meet CCNE accreditation.

Keywords: nursing; behavioral sciences; academics; education; social sciences; educational administration; leadership; and policy; educational measurement and assessment; management education; management (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244016656231 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:sagope:v:6:y:2016:i:2:p:2158244016656231

DOI: 10.1177/2158244016656231

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in SAGE Open
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().