Does Experiencing a Crash Make All the Difference? An Experiment on the Depression Babies Hypothesis

Amanda Safford, James Sundali and Federico Guerrero

SAGE Open, 2018, vol. 8, issue 2, 2158244018778734

Abstract: Do people who lived through the depression take fewer financial risks because of the negative returns experienced? More generally, what is the importance of historical return streams on current investment decisions? This experiment tests this experience hypothesis and finds that subjects who experience a great crash hold, on average, 6% less of their assets in stocks than subjects who did not experience the crash, after controlling for gender, employment status, and financial literacy. Our results suggest that subjects who experience a significant market crash have lower and more volatile beliefs regarding future stock returns. Furthermore, we find that experiencing a crash causes a significant difference in the overall belief distributions between the two groups, with the crash cohort holding more realistic beliefs about future stock market returns.

Keywords: laboratory experiments; investment decisions; behavioral finance; asset allocation; depression babies; myopic loss aversion (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/2158244018778734 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:sagope:v:8:y:2018:i:2:p:2158244018778734

DOI: 10.1177/2158244018778734

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in SAGE Open
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().