Psychopathology, Defence Mechanisms, and the Psychosocial Work Environment

Anelia Larsen, Henrik Bøggild, Jens Tølbøll Mortensen, Leslie Foldager, John Hansen, Anders Christensen, Mikkel Arendt, Nicole Rosenberg and Povl Munk-Jørgensen
Additional contact information
Anelia Larsen: Unit for Psychiatric Research, Aalborg Psychiatric Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
Henrik Bøggild: North Jutland Public Health Medical Office, Denmark
Jens Tølbøll Mortensen: Department of Social Medicine and Department of Occupational Medicine, Aalborg Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
Leslie Foldager: Centre for Psychiatric Research, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
John Hansen: Unit for Psychiatric Research, Aalborg Psychiatric Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
Anders Christensen: Psychiatric Department, Vejle General Hospital, Denmark
Mikkel Arendt: Clinic for Anxiety Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
Nicole Rosenberg: Clinic for Anxiety Disorders, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
Povl Munk-Jørgensen: Unit for Psychiatric Research, Aalborg Psychiatric Hospital, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark, pmj@rn.dk

International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2010, vol. 56, issue 6, 563-577

Abstract: Background: The body of evidence verifies the predictive value of certain work characteristics for mental health problems and that various levels of adaptation mechanisms are employed when dealing with adversity. Data on the relationships between employees’ mental health status, their perceptions of work, and their psychological defences are scarce. Aims: To examine the role that personal defences play in the relationship between psychiatric symptoms among working people and their working environment. Methods: Nine hundred and seventy six employees (mean age = 42.4 years, SD = 11.3) participated in a questionnaire study that included the Defence Style Questionnaire, the Symptom Checklist 90 revised, and the Copenhagen Psychosocial Questionnaire . Results: Data showed that greater maturity of psychological defences was associated with higher level of psychological functioning and there were strong associations between presence of psychopathology and the three defence clusters. Results indicated a strong positive correlation between the mature defence style and the perception of a satisfactory workplace. There was no interaction between psychopathology and defences in relation to work environment. Conclusion: Psychopathology and defences were significantly associated with work conditions, which could suggest that adaptation mechanisms and psychopathology are two independent forms of adjustment to the rapidly changing world of work.

Keywords: defence styles; psychopathology; work environment; adaptation; working population (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764008099555 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:56:y:2010:i:6:p:563-577

DOI: 10.1177/0020764008099555

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().