EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A community–academic partnership develops a more responsive model to providing depression care to disadvantaged adults in the US

Deborah Dobransky-Fasiska, Mary Patricia Nowalk, Mario Cruz, Michelle L. McMurray, Enrico Castillo, Amy E. Begley, Pamala Pyle, Harold Alan Pincus, Charles F. Reynolds and Charlotte Brown

International Journal of Social Psychiatry, 2012, vol. 58, issue 3, 295-305

Abstract: Background: Socioeconomically disadvantaged adults experience greater healthcare disparities and increased risk of depression compared to higher-income groups. Aim: To create a depression care model for disadvantaged adults utilizing service agencies, through a community–academic partnership. Methods: Using participatory research methods, an organizational needs assessment was performed to ascertain depression care needs, identify barriers to clients receiving treatment, and marshal resources. Interviews and surveys were conducted with community organizational leaders. Focus groups were conducted with clients who used the service agencies. Results: Interviews and surveys identified barriers including discontinuity of care and unmet basic needs for food, housing, health insurance and transportation. Focus groups enriched the understanding of barriers including lack of motivation to seek depression care, lack of social support and needed resources for the uninsured, underinsured and homeless. The findings were used to develop a depression care model combining depression management with motivational interviewing to evaluate and meet needs, and peer education to motivate and provide support. Conclusions: This partnership facilitated the development of a community-driven intervention that academic researchers acting alone could not realize. To provide depression care to socioeconomically disadvantaged individuals, the intervention must include mitigating solutions to barriers.

Keywords: depression; participatory research; community–academic partnership; needs assessment; disadvantaged communities; interviews; survey; focus groups (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2012
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0020764010396406 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:58:y:2012:i:3:p:295-305

DOI: 10.1177/0020764010396406

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in International Journal of Social Psychiatry
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:socpsy:v:58:y:2012:i:3:p:295-305