EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

A Tale of Two Sociologies: Analyzing Versus Critique in UK Sociology

Malcolm Williams, Luke Sloan and Charlotte Brookfield
Additional contact information
Malcolm Williams: Cardiff University, UK
Luke Sloan: Cardiff University, UK
Charlotte Brookfield: Cardiff University, UK

Sociological Research Online, 2017, vol. 22, issue 4, 132-151

Abstract: Several studies, in recent years, have demonstrated what has become known as the ‘quantitative deficit’ in UK sociology. This deficit is primarily manifested through negative student attitudes towards quantitative methods, a lack of ability in that area and a paucity of quantitative research and publication in the discipline that utilises quantitative methods. While we acknowledge the existence of that deficit, we argue in this article, and present some initial evidence in support of this argument, that the issue is not simply just about a ‘crisis of number’ but the kind of sociology taught and practised in the United Kingdom. We suggest here that there are two broad categories of sociology that do not necessarily divide along quantitative–qualitative lines, which we term ‘analytic’ and ‘critique’. Much of UK sociology takes a ‘critique’ approach, which may well be a quite legitimate way to do sociology, but is not a sufficient basis on which quantitative sociology can be done and has implications for the future of the discipline.

Keywords: analysis; critique; quantitative deficit; statistics (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2017
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780417734146 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:socres:v:22:y:2017:i:4:p:132-151

DOI: 10.1177/1360780417734146

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Research Online
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:socres:v:22:y:2017:i:4:p:132-151