Workplace Harassment Interventions and Labour Process Theory: A Critical Realist Synthesis of the Literature

Elizabeth Quinlan, Susan Robertson, Tracey Carr and Angie Gerrard
Additional contact information
Elizabeth Quinlan: University of Saskatchewan, Canada
Susan Robertson: University of Saskatchewan, Canada
Tracey Carr: University of Saskatchewan, Canada
Angie Gerrard: University of Saskatchewan, Canada

Sociological Research Online, 2020, vol. 25, issue 1, 3-22

Abstract: Workplace harassment, from a labour process theoretic perspective, is a consequence of the convergence of several historical trends that affect the way work is organized under contemporary capitalism. On this view, interventions such as communication skills training, complaint procedures, and workplace policies have limited chance of eliminating harassment in the workplace. However, there is minimal research identifying, testing, and refining the theories accounting for how and why particular interventions work and under what circumstances. Our critical realist evaluation of the workplace harassment intervention literature responds to this gap. The mid-range theory of workplace harassment interventions presented in this article derives from the synthesized literature, augmented by Habermasian theory of social transformation to elaborate intervention mechanisms as lifeworld impulses. The provisional propositions of the mid-range theory are offered to inspire their empirical testing for the theory’s further refinement.

Keywords: critical realist evaluation; labour process; workplace harassment (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780419846507 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:socres:v:25:y:2020:i:1:p:3-22

DOI: 10.1177/1360780419846507

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Research Online
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().