Social Conventions and Boundary Work in an Online Q&A: The Example of Vegetarianism and Veganism

Nicklas Neuman

Sociological Research Online, 2020, vol. 25, issue 4, 609-625

Abstract: The aim of this article is to explore the regulation of social conventions (more or less arbitrary norms of how one ought to act that are based on joint commitments) in online interaction. As the empirical case, the article scrutinises discussions about what it means to exercise vegetarianism or veganism. Drawing on ‘naturally occurring’ data from the question-and-answer platform Yahoo! Answers, conventions of vegetarianism and veganism are argued to be protected and upheld through symbolic boundaries, primarily in three forms: incompatibility, inauthenticity and noncommitment. Moreover, by utilising the platform’s system of thumbs-up and thumbs-down, it is argued that we are provided evidence of social approvals and sanctions in real time. The findings are suggested to have implications for continued theorising on conventions, studies of boundaries in the social sciences and analyses of social media as an arena for re-orientations of established sociological problems.

Keywords: boundary work; online interaction; social conventions; social media; social regulation; veganism; vegetarianism; Yahoo! Answers (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2020
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1360780419898201 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:socres:v:25:y:2020:i:4:p:609-625

DOI: 10.1177/1360780419898201

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Research Online
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().