Necessary Evils? Opening up Closings in Sociology and Biotechnology

Les Gofton and Erica Haimes

Sociological Research Online, 1999, vol. 4, issue 3, 14-23

Abstract: This paper argues for an opening up of the theoretical and empirical closure on issues related to biotechnology. It argues that the real differences between issues and approaches in the disparate areas where genetic modification is used, from medicine to food production, have tended, for specific reasons, to be treated as though they could all be subsumed within a common set of issues and theoretical perspectives. Using examples from the existing sociological work in medicine and food, the paper presents an argument against the commonly assumed theoreticýprimacy of scientific discourses, often focussed on common issues of risk, and the related assumption thatýresistance to the introduction of gm products is best addressed by providing information and education. It argues rather that we need to treat each area as a very particularýresearch topic, and to maintain a clearýnotion of the variety of perspectives needingýto be employed in treating quite distinct applications of these varied technologies.

Keywords: Biotechnologies; Comparative; Consumption; Food; Genetics; Medicine; Science And Knowledge; Sociology (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 1999
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.5153/sro.339 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:socres:v:4:y:1999:i:3:p:14-23

DOI: 10.5153/sro.339

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Research Online
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().