On Rescuing the Nonequivalent-Control-Group Design

Lawrence B. Mohr
Additional contact information
Lawrence B. Mohr: University of Michigan

Sociological Methods & Research, 1982, vol. 11, issue 1, 53-80

Abstract: The nonequivalent-control-group design is important because true experimental designs are frequently either infeasible or undesirable and other quasi-experimental designs have only quite limited applications. This design, however, has been disparaged as nearly useless because it depends upon statistical methods that may give biased results when applied to it. The design is too important to let lie in this condition. It is suggested that slight modifications, a few of which have been offered by others, might render it more reliable. One such modification, quite simple, widely applicable, and highly restorative of internal validity, is suggested here. The bias associated with the standard design is presented as resulting from basic violations of the assumptions of statistical methods. Both reduction of the bias and estimation of its extent are shown to be possible if the comparison group is selected at random from the relevant population and used by itself, rather than in conjunction with the experimental group, for the preliminary estimation of parameters. The modified design is shown to have various advantages relative to its unmodified form and even, at times, relative to true experimental designs. A secondary purpose of this article, supportive of the first, is to clarify the analysis of evaluation designs by conceptualizing the issues in terms of ordinary least-squares regression.

Date: 1982
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124182011001003 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:11:y:1982:i:1:p:53-80

DOI: 10.1177/0049124182011001003

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().