A Cautionary Note on the Use of Principal Components Analysis

Raymond Hubbard and Stuart J. Allen
Additional contact information
Raymond Hubbard: Drake University
Stuart J. Allen: Pennsylvania State University—Behrend College

Sociological Methods & Research, 1987, vol. 16, issue 2, 301-308

Abstract: In a recent edition of this journal, Borgatta et al. (1986), using hypothetical data, illustrated how the results produced by principal components analysis can be substantially different from those of common factor analysis. The present article, using seven well-known data sets, extends their work into the empirical domain, and also compares the results of the maximum likelihood factor analysis model with those of the principal components model. The results strongly support those of Borgatta et al. Indeed, the discrepancies in the empirical results reported here are often larger than their hypothetical example suggests. It was found that, when comparing the performance of the principal components model with the common factor and maximum likelihood models, differences can be expected to occur in (1) the magnitudes of the factor loadings, (2) the signs attached to the factor loadings, and, most important, (3) the interpretation of the factors themselves.

Date: 1987
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124187016002005 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:16:y:1987:i:2:p:301-308

DOI: 10.1177/0049124187016002005

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().