Testing Typological Hypotheses
Richard B. Warnecke and
Richard A. Zeller
Additional contact information
Richard B. Warnecke: Department of Sociology State University of New York at Buffalo
Richard A. Zeller: Department of Sociology State University of New York at Buffalo
Sociological Methods & Research, 1973, vol. 1, issue 3, 275-301
Abstract:
Though it has played an important role in sociological inquiry, typological research has been criticized on two major issues. Theorists have been critical of the tendency to reify theoretical concepts by treating them as if they were directly observable; quantitative researchers have been critical of the tendency among typologists toward oversimplification of measurment. The basic thesis of this paper is that both issues are related to the failure to distinguish between theoretical terms and empirical constructs and to recognize that the relationship between the two can never be directly ascertained. Through an example, a logic of testing typological hypotheses is explored, utilizing multivariate statistical procedures. The results indicate that such an approach is very useful in testing hypotheses derived from typologies and in_ providing complex measures of configurations implied by the theory without committing the error of reification. Moreover, the results tend to point to specific areas where the theory is limited or inadequate to explain concrete phenomenon.
Date: 1973
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004912417300100301 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:1:y:1973:i:3:p:275-301
DOI: 10.1177/004912417300100301
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().