Adjusting for Overdispersion in an Analysis of Comparative Social Mobility

Garrett M. Fitzmaurice and John H. Goldthorpe
Additional contact information
Garrett M. Fitzmaurice: Nuffield College, Oxford University
John H. Goldthorpe: Nuffield College, Oxford University

Sociological Methods & Research, 1997, vol. 25, issue 3, 267-283

Abstract: The authors discuss the problem of overdispersion in large-scale data sets and its potential impact on standard model selection strategies. Overdispersion is considered to be present when the data display more variability than is predicted by the assumed sampling model. In a recent cross-national analysis of social mobility, data were combined from nine national studies that employed somewhat different sampling schemes and related data collection procedures. Ignoring these features of the data is quite likely to introduce excess dispersion. Typically, the presence of overdispersion can be due to design effects, hidden clusters, or the absence of relevant explanatory variables in the model. When there is overdispersion, model selection based on the standard likelihood ratio test, the Akaike information criterion, or the Bayesian information criterion generally would be expected to perform poorly. A very simple adjustment to these model selection criteria, to account for overdispersion, is proposed.

Date: 1997
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124197025003001 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:25:y:1997:i:3:p:267-283

DOI: 10.1177/0049124197025003001

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().