A Comparison of Randomized Response, Computer-Assisted Self-Interview, and Face-to-Face Direct Questioning

Peter G. M. van der HEIJDEN, Ger van GILS, Jan Bouts and Joop J. Hox
Additional contact information
Peter G. M. van der HEIJDEN: Utrecht University
Ger van GILS: BeleidsOnderzoek en Advies
Jan Bouts: Nederlands Instituut voor de Publieke Opinie en het Marktonderzoek
Joop J. Hox: Utrecht University

Sociological Methods & Research, 2000, vol. 28, issue 4, 505-537

Abstract: This article assesses the validity of responses to sensitive questions using four different methods. In an experimental setting, the authors compared a computer-assisted self-interview (CASI), face-to-face direct questioning, and two different varieties of randomized response. All respondents interviewed had been identified as having committed welfare and unemployment benefit fraud. The interviewers did not know that respondents had been caught for fraud, and the respondents did not know that the researchers had this information. The results are evaluated by comparing the percentage of false negatives. The authors also looked for variables that might explain why some respondents admit fraud and others do not. The proportions of respondents admitting fraud are relatively low, between 19 percent and 49 percent. The two randomized response conditions were superior in eliciting admissions of fraud. A number of background variables, notably gender, age, still receiving benefit, and duration and perception of fraud, are related to admitting fraud. Although the randomized response conditions performed much better than face-to-face direct questioning and CASI, the percentage of respondents admitting fraud is only around 50 percent. Some possible reasons for this are discussed.

Date: 2000
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124100028004005 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:28:y:2000:i:4:p:505-537

DOI: 10.1177/0049124100028004005

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().