Least Absolute Deviation Estimation in Structural Equation Modeling
Enno Siemsen and
Kenneth A. Bollen
Additional contact information
Enno Siemsen: University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, siemsen@uiuc.edu.
Kenneth A. Bollen: University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Sociological Methods & Research, 2007, vol. 36, issue 2, 227-265
Abstract:
Least absolute deviation (LAD) is a well-known criterion to fit statistical models, but little is known about LAD estimation in structural equation modeling (SEM). To address this gap, the authors use the LAD criterion in SEM by minimizing the sum of the absolute deviations between the observed and the model-implied covariance matrices. Using Monte Carlo simulations, the authors compare the performance of this LAD estimator along several dimensions (bias, efficiency, convergence, frequencies of improper solutions, and absolute percentage deviation) to the full information maximum likelihood (ML) and unweighted least squares (ULS) estimators in structural equation modeling. The results for LAD are mixed: There are special conditions under which the LAD estimator outperforms ML and ULS, but the simulation evidence does not support a general claim that LAD is superior to ML and ULS in small samples.
Keywords: least absolute deviation; structural equation modeling; robust estimation; small sample research (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2007
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124107301946 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:36:y:2007:i:2:p:227-265
DOI: 10.1177/0049124107301946
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().