EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

An Empirical Evaluation of the Use of Fixed Cutoff Points in RMSEA Test Statistic in Structural Equation Models

Feinian Chen, Patrick J. Curran, Kenneth A. Bollen, James Kirby and Pamela Paxton
Additional contact information
Feinian Chen: North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC
Patrick J. Curran: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
Kenneth A. Bollen: University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
James Kirby: Agency for Healthcare Research & Quality, Rockville, MD
Pamela Paxton: Ohio State University, Columbus

Sociological Methods & Research, 2008, vol. 36, issue 4, 462-494

Abstract: This article is an empirical evaluation of the choice of fixed cutoff points in assessing the root mean square error of approximation (RMSEA) test statistic as a measure of goodness-of-fit in Structural Equation Models. Using simulation data, the authors first examine whether there is any empirical evidence for the use of a universal cutoff, and then compare the practice of using the point estimate of the RMSEA alone versus that of using it jointly with its related confidence interval. The results of the study demonstrate that there is little empirical support for the use of .05 or any other value as universal cutoff values to determine adequate model fit, regardless of whether the point estimate is used alone or jointly with the confidence interval. The authors' analyses suggest that to achieve a certain level of power or Type I error rate, the choice of cutoff values depends on model specifications, degrees of freedom, and sample size.

Keywords: RMSEA; SEM; goodness-of-fit; computer simulations (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (19)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124108314720 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:36:y:2008:i:4:p:462-494

DOI: 10.1177/0049124108314720

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:36:y:2008:i:4:p:462-494