The Confounding of Measured and Unmeasured Variables

H.M. Blalock
Additional contact information
H.M. Blalock: University of Washington

Sociological Methods & Research, 1975, vol. 3, issue 4, 355-383

Abstract: Given the impossibility of measuring and including more than a few of the variables that ideally belong in a theoretical model, we know that biases are introduced when omitted variables are confounded with measured variables. In particular, professional or ideological biases may affect the labels attached to interrelated sets of variables. In sociology we tend to confound "status effects" with many possible nonstatus effects of objective characteristics such as education, occupation, or income. It is shown that, without the introduction of simplifying assumptions, such status and nonstatus effects cannot be disentangled. The case of "status" and "power" effects is also discussed.

Date: 1975
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004912417500300401 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:3:y:1975:i:4:p:355-383

DOI: 10.1177/004912417500300401

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().