The Effects of Asking Filter Questions in Interleafed Versus Grouped Format

Frauke Kreuter, Susan McCulloch, Stanley Presser and Roger Tourangeau
Additional contact information
Frauke Kreuter: University of Maryland, College Park, USA, fkreuter@survey.umd.edu, Institute for Employment Research, Nuremberg, Germany
Susan McCulloch: Marist College Institute for Public Opinion, USA, University of Maryland, College Park, USA
Stanley Presser: University of Maryland, College Park, USA
Roger Tourangeau: University of Maryland, College Park, USA, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA

Sociological Methods & Research, 2011, vol. 40, issue 1, 88-104

Abstract: When filter questions are asked to determine respondent eligibility for follow-up items, they are administered either interleafed (follow-up items immediately after the relevant filter) or grouped (follow-up items after multiple filters). Experiments with mental health items have found the interleafed form produces fewer yeses to later filters than the grouped form. Given the sensitivity of mental health, it is unclear whether this is due to respondent desire to avoid sensitive issues or simply the desire to shorten the interview. The absence of validation data in these studies also means the nature of the measurement error associated with the filter types is unknown. We conducted an experiment using mainly nonsensitive topics of varying cognitive burden with a sample that allowed validation of some items. Filter format generally had an effect, which grew as the number of filters increased and was larger when the follow-up questions were more difficult. Surprisingly, there was no evidence that measurement error for filters was reduced in the grouped version; moreover, missing data for follow-up items was increased in that version.

Keywords: questionnaire design; filter questions; respondent behavior; response burden (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (8)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124110392342 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:40:y:2011:i:1:p:88-104

DOI: 10.1177/0049124110392342

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().