Measurement Equivalence of Ordinal Items: A Comparison of Factor Analytic, Item Response Theory, and Latent Class Approaches
Miloš Kankaraš,
Jeroen K. Vermunt and
Guy Moors
Additional contact information
Miloš Kankaraš: Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands, m.kankaras@uvt.nl
Jeroen K. Vermunt: Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Guy Moors: Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands
Authors registered in the RePEc Author Service: Miloš Kankaraš ()
Sociological Methods & Research, 2011, vol. 40, issue 2, 279-310
Abstract:
Three distinctive methods of assessing measurement equivalence of ordinal items, namely, confirmatory factor analysis, differential item functioning using item response theory, and latent class factor analysis, make different modeling assumptions and adopt different procedures. Simulation data are used to compare the performance of these three approaches in detecting the sources of measurement inequivalence. For this purpose, the authors simulated Likert-type data using two nonlinear models, one with categorical and one with continuous latent variables. Inequivalence was set up in the slope parameters (loadings) as well as in the item intercept parameters in a form resembling agreement and extreme response styles. Results indicate that the item response theory and latent class factor models can relatively accurately detect and locate inequivalence in the intercept and slope parameters both at the scale and the item levels. Confirmatory factor analysis performs well when inequivalence is located in the slope parameters but wrongfully indicates inequivalence in the slope parameters when inequivalence is located in the intercept parameters. Influences of sample size, number of inequivalent items in a scale, and model fit criteria on the performance of the three methods are also analyzed.
Keywords: ordinal items; inequivalence; modeling assumptions; simulation data (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0049124111405301 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:40:y:2011:i:2:p:279-310
DOI: 10.1177/0049124111405301
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().