Talk Is Cheap
Colin Jerolmack and
Sociological Methods & Research, 2014, vol. 43, issue 2, 178-209
This article examines the methodological implications of the fact that what people say is often a poor predictor of what they do. We argue that many interview and survey researchers routinely conflate self-reports with behavior and assume a consistency between attitudes and action. We call this erroneous inference of situated behavior from verbal accounts the attitudinal fallacy. Though interviewing and ethnography are often lumped together as â€œqualitative methods,â€ by juxtaposing studies of â€œculture in actionâ€ based on verbal accounts with ethnographic investigations, we show that the latter routinely attempts to explain the â€œattitudeâ€“behavior problemâ€ while the former regularly ignores it. Because meaning and action are collectively negotiated and context-dependent, we contend that self-reports of attitudes and behaviors are of limited value in explaining what people actually do because they are overly individualistic and abstracted from lived experience.
Keywords: ethnography; methods; attitudinal fallacy; culture; interaction (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:43:y:2014:i:2:p:178-209
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Series data maintained by SAGE Publications ().