The Effects of Interview Schedule Variations On Reported Sexual Behavior

John DeLamater and Patricia MacCorquodale
Additional contact information
John DeLamater: University of Wisconsin-Madison
Patricia MacCorquodale: University of Wisconsin-Madison

Sociological Methods & Research, 1975, vol. 4, issue 2, 215-236

Abstract: Discussions of survey research often assert that characteristics of the schedule affect the data obtained, particularly when the topic is "sensitive. " This research varied three aspects of an interview schedule designed to measure sexual behavior: (1) whether behavior was assessed by interviewer questions or a self-administered questionnaire; (2) the location of questions concerning sexual experience (at the middle or at the end of the interview); and (3) the order or sequence of questions concerning current behavior, partner's characteristics, and partner's ideology. Interviews were conducted with four subsamples of young adults: single male university undergraduates (n = 432), single female undergraduates (429), single male nonstudents (220), and single female nonstudents (293). The results indicate that none of the variations had any substantial effect on reported sexual behavior. These findings are consistent with other analyses in suggesting that such methodological variations are not a major source of differential responses in surveys.

Date: 1975
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004912417500400204 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:4:y:1975:i:2:p:215-236

DOI: 10.1177/004912417500400204

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().