Prestige or Socioeconomic Scales in the Study of Occupational Achievement?

David L. Featherman and Robert M. Hauser
Additional contact information
David L. Featherman: University of Wisconsin, Madison
Robert M. Hauser: University of Wisconsin, Madison

Sociological Methods & Research, 1976, vol. 4, issue 4, 403-422

Abstract: Current research on status attainment usually employs either a scale of prestige or of socioeconomic status to rank order occupation titles. Consistently, in the United States (and in limited international comparisons), correlations among variables in basic stratification models which rest upon data in the metric of socioeconomic status are higher than those reflecting occupational prestige. Earlier work advanced a substantive argument for this outcome to the effect that occupational stratification is fundamentally socioeconomic and not prestige mobility. Here we underscore the substantive argument by ruling out two artifactual explanations for these higher correlations. Neither the differential metric properties of the two scales (e.g., the longer "tails" of the Duncan Socioeconomic Index than the NORC prestige scale) nor the component properties of the Duncan scale account for these correlational differences.

Date: 1976
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004912417600400401 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:4:y:1976:i:4:p:403-422

DOI: 10.1177/004912417600400401

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().