Iteration in Mixed-Methods Research Designs Combining Experiments and Fieldwork 1, 2
Verónica Pérez Bentancur and
LucÃa Tiscornia
Sociological Methods & Research, 2024, vol. 53, issue 2, 729-759
Abstract:
Experimental designs in the social sciences have received increasing attention due to their power to produce causal inferences. Nevertheless, experimental research faces limitations, including limited external validity and unrealistic treatments. We propose combining qualitative fieldwork and experimental design iteratively—moving back-and-forth between elements of a research design—to overcome these limitations. To properly evaluate the strength of experiments researchers need information about the context, data, and previous knowledge used to design the treatment. To support our argument, we analyze 338 pre-analysis plans submitted to the Evidence in Governance and Politics repository in 2019 and the design of a study on public opinion support for punitive policing practices in Montevideo, Uruguay. The paper provides insights about using qualitative fieldwork to enhance the external validity, transparency and replicability of experimental research, and a practical guide for researchers who want to incorporate iteration to their research designs.
Keywords: Iteration; research design; experiments; qualitative fieldwork; mixed-methods (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/00491241221082595 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:53:y:2024:i:2:p:729-759
DOI: 10.1177/00491241221082595
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().