Level of Measurement

Edgar F. Borgatta and George W. Bohrnstedt
Additional contact information
Edgar F. Borgatta: Graduate Center, City University of New York
George W. Bohrnstedt: Indiana University-Bloomington

Sociological Methods & Research, 1980, vol. 9, issue 2, 147-160

Abstract: The distinctions between nominal, ordinal, interval, and ratio measurement were popularized by S. S. Stevens. Unfortunately, positions taken by Stevens have often been disseminated without criticism. One problem is the common assumption that "ordinal" statistics are the best statistics to use for presumed noninterval continuous social variables, when, in fact, they use addition, subtraction, and division, which make the measurements interval by definition. Additionally, the relationship of the normal distribution to interval measurement is commonly misunderstood, the latter existing by definition if a normal distribution exists. Concern with levels of measurements may mislead persons into attending to issues other than maximizing (utility, given) the particular limits of the state of the measurement art in the social sciences .

Date: 1980
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004912418000900202 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:9:y:1980:i:2:p:147-160

DOI: 10.1177/004912418000900202

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().