EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Heterogeneous Samples in Organizational Research

David F. Gillespie and Dennis S. Mileti
Additional contact information
David F. Gillespie: Washington University
Dennis S. Mileti: Colorado State University

Sociological Methods & Research, 1981, vol. 9, issue 3, 375-388

Abstract: The utility of heterogeneous versus homogeneous samples in comparative organizational research is appraised through a path analytic comparison of the relationships between organizational size, spatial, vertical and horizontal differentiation established with samples representing different degrees of homo-heterogeneity. A causal model is estimated on data of 115 business and government organizations. The estimated parameters of the model are compared to those of Blau and Schoenherr based on a homogeneous sample of employment agencies, and Mileti, Gillespie, and Haas's sample of mixed government agencies. The findings suggest the potential utility of increasing our use of heterogeneous samples in comparative organizational research.

Date: 1981
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/004912418100900307 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:somere:v:9:y:1981:i:3:p:375-388

DOI: 10.1177/004912418100900307

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Sociological Methods & Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:somere:v:9:y:1981:i:3:p:375-388