Quality of Governance, Corruption and Absolute Child Poverty in India
Journal of South Asian Development, 2015, vol. 10, issue 2, 148-167
Mundle, Chakraborty, Chowdhury and Sikdar (2012) developed the first quality of governance (QoG) measures to assess the performance of Indiaâ€™s states. The present article builds on Mundle et al.â€™s (2012) framework by analyzing the relationship between their QoG measures and absolute child poverty in India. The empirical analysis also includes corruption indicators from Transparency International to test the relative importance of corruption and governance for combating child poverty. I combine macro (states) and micro data (children) with multilevel statistical models to achieve this task. A key finding is that governance has more explanatory power than corruption. Further, among Mundleetal.â€™s six measures, the BORDA measure performs consistently better and explains about 60 per cent of the between-states variation: one unit improvement in BORDA yields about 1 per cent decrease in absolute child poverty. The sensitivity of this inference is tested with regards to severe education, shelter and food deprivation.
Keywords: Good governance; India; child poverty; corruption; economic development (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:soudev:v:10:y:2015:i:2:p:148-167
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of South Asian Development
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().