Does Citizen Participation Improve Local Planning? An Empirical Analysis of Stakeholdersâ€™ Perceptions in Nepal
Ganesh Prasad Pandeya and
Shree Krishna Shrestha
Journal of South Asian Development, 2016, vol. 11, issue 3, 276-304
Using a qualitative approach, based on extensive fieldwork and surveys, this article examines how participatory institutions in Nepal perform and affect local planning. The evidence points to mixed outcomes: citizen participation can improve local planning, especially with regard to achieving planning efficacy and equity; and at the same time, it sometimes yields no such effects or may produce negative effects including raising expectations, skewing priorities and producing faulty compartmentalization, besides adding to administrative complexities. This is because the anticipated benefits of citizen participation are strongly embedded in local, socio-political realities such as the degree of power exercised by the local elites, mainly politicians, a collusive nexus among them, prior history of citizen mobilization and empowerment and the degree to which citizens and civil society organizations are able to exercise their agency to countervail those forces.
Keywords: Citizen participation; local planning; planning efficacy; positive and negative outcomes; Nepal (search for similar items in EconPapers)
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:soudev:v:11:y:2016:i:3:p:276-304
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Journal of South Asian Development
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().