Should antitrust regulators be wary of inter-firm coordination agreements through a tourism destination card?
Carmen D Ã lvarez-Albelo and
José A MartÃnez-González
Tourism Economics, 2024, vol. 30, issue 2, 324-344
Abstract:
Inter-firm coordination agreements through a destination card (DC) are a widespread profit-increasing strategy in tourism destinations. Literature on tourism economics argues that this type of coordination increases social efficiency. However, industrial organization studies consider heterogeneous consumers and warn that a DC-type agreement can be welfare impairing. Conflicting views have become an issue for tourism destinations, as collusion is in the crosshairs of antitrust regulators. This paper aims to clarify these contradictory results by developing a duopoly model with heterogeneous tourists. A sensible demand structure is assumed which, unlike previous literature, includes loyal demand segments. A policy prescription is obtained, namely, a DC alliance is welfare enhancing if DC price is equal to or lower than the cost of joint consumption under no coordination. However, a greater total surplus in markets may be accompanied by a reduction in consumer welfare, which differs from the conventional view in tourism economics.
Keywords: Tourism destination card; heterogeneous tourists; loyal demand segments; social efficiency (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2024
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/13548166221138364 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:toueco:v:30:y:2024:i:2:p:324-344
DOI: 10.1177/13548166221138364
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Tourism Economics
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().