EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Are individualistic attitudes killing collectivism?

David Peetz
Additional contact information
David Peetz: Professor of Employment Relations, Centre for Work, Organisation and Wellbeing, Griffith Business School, Griffith University, Australia, d.peetz@griffith.edu.au

Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 2010, vol. 16, issue 3, 383-398

Abstract: This article addresses a core aspect of the question: ‘is the collectivism of labour in fundamental decline?’ It pays particular attention to attitudes towards collectivism using national and cross-national data on trends in dimensions of collectivism over periods of up to two decades. The data indicate that collective values and identities are today broadly as strong (or weak) as they were two or three decades ago. If individualization is the problem, then we should not look at individualization of attitudes but attempts by employers and governments to individualize the employment relationship. Union organizing strategies need to reinforce union values and build solidarities across groups which are more complex and heterogeneous than in the past.

Keywords: Individualization; collectivism; union strategies; union renewal; attitudes; identity; values (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2010
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1024258910373869 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:treure:v:16:y:2010:i:3:p:383-398

DOI: 10.1177/1024258910373869

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:treure:v:16:y:2010:i:3:p:383-398