Has European sectoral social dialogue improved since the establishment of SSDCs in 1998?
Christophe Degryse and
Philippe Pochet
Additional contact information
Christophe Degryse: ETUI, cdegryse@etui.org
Philippe Pochet: Director, ETUI, ppochet@etui.org
Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 2011, vol. 17, issue 2, 145-158
Abstract:
This article looks at the way in which European sectoral social dialogue has developed over the past 20 years. It tries to determine whether the establishment of Sectoral Social Dialogue Committees in 1998 (SSDCs; currently 40) has affected the nature and/or quantity of texts adopted by these bodies. To this end, two periods are considered: 1990—1997 and 1998—2009. A first finding is that European sectoral social dialogue has burgeoned since the mid-1990s. The establishment of SSDCs therefore forms part of this expansion. Our main finding is that, whereas previously sectoral social dialogue was primarily geared towards ‘joint lobbying’ documents addressed to the European institutions, it now appears to be generating more documents that reflect ‘reciprocal commitments’. Yet this trend is really only perceptible from 2003 onwards, five years after the first SSDCs were established. The increased number of binding joint texts adopted can be explained by the Commission having undertaken more consultation (under Treaty Article 154) which opened a window of opportunity for the social partners to sign ‘agreements’.
Keywords: European Union; sectoral social dialogue; sectoral social dialogue committee (SSDC) (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (3)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1024258911401366 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:treure:v:17:y:2011:i:2:p:145-158
DOI: 10.1177/1024258911401366
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().