Individualisation reversed: the cross-class politics of social regulation in the UK’s public/private pension mix

Paul Bridgen and Traute Meyer
Additional contact information
Paul Bridgen: Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK
Traute Meyer: Social Sciences, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 2018, vol. 24, issue 1, 25-41

Abstract: Since the turn of the century UK pension politics has been dominated by legislative and regulatory efforts to increase the state’s redistributive role in the pension system. Such developments are unexpected by the theoretical literature on welfare states. This predicts regulatory disputes in multi-pillar pension systems, but does not expect egalitarian reforms in liberal systems like the UK where organised labour is weak. We explain these reforms as a product of a temporary cross-class alliance, facilitated by a cohesive pension policy network, and formalised by an independent Pensions Commission. The consensus was possible because the public/private nature of the UK pension system politicised the non-state sphere, shaping the preferences of pension policy actors, and leading business to reach a compromise agreement with unions.

Keywords: Regulation; redistribution; pension politics; UK; public/private mix (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2018
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1024258917746031 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:treure:v:24:y:2018:i:1:p:25-41

DOI: 10.1177/1024258917746031

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().