Reflecting the changing world of work? A critique of existing survey measures and a proposal for capturing new ways of working

Yvonne Lott, Clare Kelliher and Heejung Chung
Additional contact information
Yvonne Lott: Hans-Böckler Foundation, Germany
Clare Kelliher: Cranfield University, UK
Heejung Chung: University of Kent, UK

Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 2022, vol. 28, issue 4, 457-473

Abstract: In recent decades we have seen significant and varied changes in the world of work. Most prominent among these is the diminishing prevalence of the standard employment relationship. These changes challenge traditional notions of what constitute ‘employment’, ‘employers’, ‘employees’, the ‘workplace’ and the ‘working day’. Many current survey instruments are still based on the concept of the standard employment relationship, however. This article illustrates some limitations of existing conceptualisations and definitions of flexible work arrangements and of the instruments used to measure them in major surveys. It also suggests ways of tackling these limitations. The aim of highlighting potential limitations of existing survey instruments is to enable data users to be more reflective about what the results actually do and do not report, and to encourage survey designers to modify existing instruments and develop new instruments to better capture contemporary realities, including multiple jobholding and internet and platform work.

Keywords: Conceptualisation; definition and measurement of flexible work arrangements; standard employment relationship; ‘normal’ work biography; multiple jobholding; internet and platform work; flexitime; working from home (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2022
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/10242589221130597 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:treure:v:28:y:2022:i:4:p:457-473

DOI: 10.1177/10242589221130597

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().