The Changing Nature of US Urban Policy Evaluation: The Case of the Urban Development Action Grant

Timothy Barnekov and Douglas Hart
Additional contact information
Timothy Barnekov: Center for Energy and Urban Policy Research, College of Urban Affairs and Public Policy, University of Delaware, USA
Douglas Hart: Department of Land Management and Development, Faculty of Urban and Regional Studies, University of Reading, P.O. Box 219, Reading RG6 2BU, UK

Urban Studies, 1993, vol. 30, issue 9, 1469-1483

Abstract: A good deal was written about the success of American urban economic initiatives in the 1960s and 1970s. Often, however, claims were made by a particular programme's proponents about that programme's benefits without those benefits being independently assessed. As a consequence, in the late 1970s and early 1980s urban policy evaluation grew significantly as a governmental activity. But by the late 1980s policy evaluation was in general retreat. This paper seeks to analyse why this occurred and concludes that the decline in support for evaluation happened for a variety of reasons, including, in particular, its perceived lack of utility for policy-makers and, relatedly, its lack of effectiveness in actually informing either policy or practice. To illustrate the kind of problems which beset policy evaluation, the Urban Development Action Grant (UDAG) was selected as a case-study, on the grounds that UDAG formed the centrepiece of urban economic development policy in America for almost a decade from 1979 to 1988. The paper goes on to suggest that the problems associated with assessing the UDAG programme were often more ideological rather than simply financial or technical. It is argued that as a consequence, formal, publicly available, urban policy evaluation has been steadily abandoned at both the federal and city levels in the US.

Date: 1993
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420989320081451 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:30:y:1993:i:9:p:1469-1483

DOI: 10.1080/00420989320081451

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().