The Political Economy of Urban Land Reform in Hawaii

Sumner La Croix, James Mak and Louis A. Rose
Additional contact information
James Mak: Department of Ecoreomics, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA
Louis A. Rose: Department of Ecoreomics, University of Hawaii, Honolulu, Hawaii 96822, USA

Urban Studies, 1995, vol. 32, issue 6, 999-1015

Abstract: In the mid 1960s there were about 22 000 single-family leasehold homes in Honolulu. Dissatisfaction with leasehold led to reform legislation in 1967, allowing lessees to buy leased land. By 1991 less than 5000 lessees remained. This paper examines why landowners elected to lease rather than sell land and attributes the rise of leasehold to legal constraints on land sales by large estates, duties of estate trustees and the federal tax code. Ideological forces initiated land reform in 1967, but rent-seeking forces captured the process in the mid 1970s. It is concluded that Hawaii's experiment with leasehold was a failure due to the difficulties associated with specifying and enforcing long-term contracts in residential land.

Date: 1995
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420989550012762 (text/html)

Related works:
Working Paper: The Political Economy of Urban Land Reform in Hawaii (1995)
Working Paper: The Political Economy of Urban Land Reform in Hawaii (1993)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:32:y:1995:i:6:p:999-1015

DOI: 10.1080/00420989550012762

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications (sagediscovery@sagepub.com).