Fragmentation and Centralisation in the Governance of London: Influencing the Urban Policy and Planning Agenda

Peter Newman and Andy Thornley
Additional contact information
Peter Newman: School of Urban Development and Planning, University of Westminster, London NW1 5LS, UK
Andy Thornley: Department of Geography, London School of Economics and Political Science, London WC2 2AE, UK, A. THORNLEY@1se.ac.uk

Urban Studies, 1997, vol. 34, issue 7, 967-988

Abstract: The government of London has fragmented. Numerous quangos have taken over urban policy and planning roles. Recently further bodies have arisen in response to the government's urban expenditure competitions. This fragmentation has been accompanied by increasing centralisation, achieved through institutional reforms, central government appointments and financial controls. Government also encouraged a considerable role for the private sector. Whilst the boroughs are included in decision-making, primary objectives are set by the private sector and are concerned with London'sworld-city role. Through a unique 'partnership' with the public and private sectors, central government claims a mandate for its policies. The future of the governance of London is contested but central government is likely to continue playing a strong role.

Date: 1997
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098975682 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:34:y:1997:i:7:p:967-988

DOI: 10.1080/0042098975682

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().