EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Entrenchment of Urban Dispersion: Residential Preferences and Location Patterns in the Dispersed City

Pierre Filion, Trudi Bunting and Keith Warriner
Additional contact information
Pierre Filion: School of Urban and Regional Planning, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada, pfiliore@fes.uwalerloo.ca+
Trudi Bunting: Department of Geography, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada, tbunting@fes.uwaterloo.ca
Keith Warriner: Department of Sociology, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada, wnrr@uwaterloo.ca

Urban Studies, 1999, vol. 36, issue 8, 1317-1347

Abstract: The paper portrays three aspects of urban dispersion: urban structure, residents' location and land-use preferences, and social ecology. To explain the dynamic inherent in this form of urbanisation, it suggests an explanatory model concentrating on shifts in the respective importance of space, place and proximity associated with the passage from traditional monocentric to dispersed urban form. The paper draws its empirical substance from the Kitchener Census Metropolitan Area, one of the most dispersed metropolitan regions in Canada. The Kitchener case study highlights the defining characteristics of a dispersed urban structure: high automobile dependence, a scattering of origins and destinations, and a resulting absence of pronounced accessibility gradients. The paper also reports the results of a survey which indicates a harmonisation of residents' preferences with the main features of dispersion. The case study ends by mapping the residential location patterns of two groups with a disproportionate influence on new urban development: high income households and families with children. Their concentric distribution is consistent with survey results. In the light of the prevailing transport-land-use relation and of residents' location choices and expressed preferences, the paper foresees a further entrenchment of the dispersed urban structure. The paper closes by explaining the limited success of most intensification policies and by exploring the possibility of injecting more diversity into the dispersed landscape in order to accommodate a growing variety of lifestyles.

Date: 1999
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098993015 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:36:y:1999:i:8:p:1317-1347

DOI: 10.1080/0042098993015

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-20
Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:36:y:1999:i:8:p:1317-1347