Design Appeals in England in the 1990s: An Aggregate Analysis
John Punter and
Andrew Bell
Additional contact information
John Punter: Department of City and Regional Planning, University of Wales Cardiff, PO Box 906, Cardiff, CF1 3YN, UK, punterj@cf.ac.uk
Andrew Bell: Department of Regional and Urban Planning, University College, Clonskeagh, Dublin 14, Eire, andrew.bell@ucd.ie
Urban Studies, 2000, vol. 37, issue 2, 275-299
Abstract:
Design is a critical area in development control practice, and design appeals constitute a particularly important set of control cases. This is especially true in Britain where developers make much more use of the appeal system than elsewhere, and where central government utilises appeals to control local planning practice. This paper examines trends in all appeals over the period 1981-95 and trends in design appeals during 1991-95. It reveals high proportions of design appeals, but stable dismissal rates close to the appeal average. Three kinds of design appeal are identified and their incidence and dismissal rates assessed. Analysis of design issues reveals the dominance of contextual factors numerically, but no wide variances in dismissal rates from issue to issue. Intrinsic design has been a relatively minor design issue, while landscaping has been almost entirely ignored at appeal. However, design issues, broadly interpreted, remain the dominant concerns at appeal. There is no evidence of design appeals becoming more likely to be dismissed as a result of more positive government advice, or as a result of the introduction of a plan-led system which introduces district-wide design policies for the first time in most areas.
Date: 2000
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098002195 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:37:y:2000:i:2:p:275-299
DOI: 10.1080/0042098002195
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().