Spatial Mismatch and Costly Suburban Commutes: Can Commuting Subsidies Help?

Richard W. Martin
Additional contact information
Richard W. Martin: Terry College of Business, University of Georgia, 206 Brooks Hall, Athens, GA 30602, USA, rmartin@terry.uga.edu

Urban Studies, 2001, vol. 38, issue 8, 1305-1318

Abstract: Proponents of the spatial mismatch hypothesis argue that job decentralisation harms low-income residents of central cities because of barriers that limit their access to suburban labour markets. Such barriers can take the form of housing discrimination, exclusionary zoning or long and difficult commutes. This paper uses an urban equilibrium model of spatial mismatch to analyse the impact of commuting subsidies on the welfare of low-income, central-city households with restricted mobility. Specifically, it seeks to determine how effective such subsidies are at reducing the welfare impact of spatial mismatch. While subsidised outward commuting is found to raise the welfare of the low-income households, the welfare gains are only a small portion of the welfare loss due to spatial mismatch.

Date: 2001
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (6)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980120061034 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:38:y:2001:i:8:p:1305-1318

DOI: 10.1080/00420980120061034

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().