EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

The Tenure Imbalance in Spain: The Need for Social Housing Policy

Montserrat Pareja Eastaway and Ignacio San Martin Varo
Additional contact information
Montserrat Pareja Eastaway: Department de Teoria Econòmica, Escola d'Empresarials, Universitat de Barcelona, Avda Diagonal, 693 3a planta, 08034 Barcelona, Spain, mpareja@eco.ub.es
Ignacio San Martin Varo: Servicio de Estudios, Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria (BBVA),28001 Madrid, Spain, jisanmartin@grupobbva.com

Urban Studies, 2002, vol. 39, issue 2, 283-295

Abstract: Spain is usually chosen as an example of an unbalanced picture among tenures. The owner-occupied sector has been growing since the 1950s while the rental sector has become smaller. Surprisingly, other European countries are at present following the same pattern, but mostly we also see an important function for social housing. Taking into account that public housing, built by public developers, is almost negligible and that government housing policy programmes basically stimulate ownership, the 'social housing' concept lacks an adequate definition in Spanish housing policy. In this sense, the encouragement of the rental sector through public policy should provide an alternative for low-income families. Despite different cultural housing backgrounds, the emergence of a reliable rental sector in Spain appears to be the most promising strategy for solving current housing problems. The aim of the paper is twofold. On the one hand, it analyses the evolution of the rental sector through recent decades, stressing how different central government regulations have affected the tenure structure in Spain. On the other, it considers the rental sector as a potential instrument for authorities to meet the housing needs of low-income families. Housing policy still plays a crucial role in offering the opportunity for certain groups to access a suitable house. What can be called the 'European shift' to the market can cause irreparable damage to those families that have benefited from former, direct or indirect, public means.

Date: 2002
References: View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (5)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980120102975 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:2:p:283-295

DOI: 10.1080/00420980120102975

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:2:p:283-295