Stratification and Spatial Segregation of Human Capital as Determinants of Metropolitan Productivity in the United States
José Lobo and
David P. Smole
Additional contact information
José Lobo: Graduate Field of Regional Science, Cornell University, 311 West Sibley Hall, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA, j125@cornell.edu
David P. Smole: Congressional Research Service, Library of Congress, LM-323, 101 Independence Avenue, SE, Washington, DC 20540-7440, USA, dsmole@crs.loc.gov
Urban Studies, 2002, vol. 39, issue 3, 529-547
Abstract:
This paper explores the dynamics of how the human capital embodied in metropolitan populations might impact metropolitan productivity. Three aspects of human capital are examined: the average aggregate level of human capital, stratification according to human capital and spatial segregation according to human capital. These are measured for the 100 largest metropolitan areas in the US for 1970, 1980 and 1990, and then tested as explanatory variables of metropolitan productivity. Econometric analysis confirms a strong relationship between higher average levels of human capital and higher productivity and growth. Stratification appears negatively correlated with productivity in 1970 and 1980, but positively correlated in 1990. Segregation appears negatively correlated with productivity in the 1970s, and in 1990 when controlling for stratification.
Date: 2002
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980220112810 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:39:y:2002:i:3:p:529-547
DOI: 10.1080/00420980220112810
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().