EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Transit Mobility, Jobs Access and Low-income Labour Participation in US Metropolitan Areas

Thomas W. Sanchez, Qing Shen and Zhong-Ren Peng
Additional contact information
Thomas W. Sanchez: Department of Urban Affairs and Planning, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University, 1021 Prince Street, Suite 200, Alexandria, VA 22314, USA, sanchezt@vt.edu
Qing Shen: Urban Studies and Planning Program, University of Maryland, College Park, 1223 Architecture Building, College Park, MD 20742, USA, qshen@umd.edu
Zhong-Ren Peng: Department of Urban Planning, University of Wiscoresin Milwaukee, PO Box 413, Milwaukee, WI 53201, USA, zpeng@uwm.edu

Urban Studies, 2004, vol. 41, issue 7, 1313-1331

Abstract: While policy-makers assert that increased public transit mobility can positively affect employment status for low-income persons, there is little empirical evidence to support this theory. It is generally assumed that public transit can effectively link unemployed, car-less, persons with appropriate job locations—hence the call for more public transit services to assist moving welfare recipients to gainful employment. Thus far, the available evidence is anecdotal, while general patterns of transit access in relationship to labour participation remain relatively unexplored. This analysis examines whether increased transit access is associated with the case status (employment status) of Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) recipients in the Atlanta, Georgia; Baltimore, Maryland; Dallas, Texas; Denver, Colorado; Milwaukee, Wisconsin ; and Portland, Oregon metropolitan areas. Individual TANF recipient location data, transit route/stop data and employment location data were used in limited dependent variable regression analyses to predict the employment status of TANF recipients. The results of this analysis indicate that access to fixed-route transit and employment concentrations had virtually no association with the employment outcomes of TANF recipients in the six selected metropolitan areas.

Date: 2004
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (28)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/0042098042000214815 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:41:y:2004:i:7:p:1313-1331

DOI: 10.1080/0042098042000214815

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:41:y:2004:i:7:p:1313-1331