EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

On the Measurement and Meaning of Residential Segregation: A Response to Simpson

Ron Johnston, Michael Poulsen and James Forrest
Additional contact information
Michael Poulsen: Department of Human Geography, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia, mike.poulsen@mq.edu.au
James Forrest: Department of Human Geography, Macquarie University, Sydney, NSW 2109, Australia, jim.forrest@mq.edu.au

Urban Studies, 2005, vol. 42, issue 7, 1221-1227

Abstract: Using an alternative conception of ethnic residential segregation, and associated statistical measures, this paper re-examines Simpson's analysis of the situation of South Asians in Bradford. It suggests that, contra Simpson, segregation of that ethnic group did increase over the period 1991-2001, with implications for public policy.

Date: 2005
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (27)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980500122010 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:7:p:1221-1227

DOI: 10.1080/00420980500122010

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:42:y:2005:i:7:p:1221-1227