Social Polarisation: Comparing Singapore, Hong Kong and Taipei
Additional contact information
Po-Fen Tai: Po-Fen Tai is in Chung Hua Landscape Architecture, 707 Wu-Fu Road Sec 2, Hsingchu 300, Taiwan, firstname.lastname@example.org
Urban Studies, 2006, vol. 43, issue 10, 1737-1756
Social polarisation theory assumes that the world's major cities tend to divide into dual social strata. However, in the context of developmental states integrated into the Greater South China economic zone, an empirical study of three Asian cities challenges the social polarisation hypothesis and suggests alternative forms of social transformation. Data on changes in employment, occupation and household income in Singapore, Hong Kong and Taipei show that urban regimes and social policies instigated by developmental states play a decisive role in the formation of social inequality and marginal urban populations.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (2) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:43:y:2006:i:10:p:1737-1756
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().