Modernism vs Urban Renaissance: Negotiating Post-war Heritage in English City Centres
Additional contact information
Aidan While: Department of Town and Regional Planning, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, S10 2TN, UK, firstname.lastname@example.org
Urban Studies, 2006, vol. 43, issue 13, 2399-2419
Redevelopment and growth regimes are often eager to remove the physical remnants of post-war modernism. Largely unloved, and ofter out-of-step with current design principles, the 1950s/60s cityscape is fast disappearing as urban leaders seek to remodel and reimage the built environment. In some places, however, the push to redevelop and reclad the modernist legacy is coming up against increasing demands for the preservation of 'modern landmarks'. Certainly in England, the decision to extend statutory protection to the post-war era has resulted in a series of conservation conflicts over the meaning and value of modernist structures. Taking the contested rehabilitation of modernism as a starting-point, this article explores potential tensions and complementarities between the politics of redevelopment and that of post-war preservation. Empirically, the article is grounded on the experience of two English city centres (Coventry and Plymouth) with historically significant, but challenging, relics of 1950s/60s modernist architecture and post-was planning. The article offers insights into the (multiscaled) politics of urban preservation and the renegotiation of modernist meaning in the city.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:43:y:2006:i:13:p:2399-2419
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().