EconPapers    
Economics at your fingertips  
 

Testing the Conventional Wisdom about Land Use and Traffic Congestion: The More We Sprawl, the Less We Move?

Andrea Sarzynski, Harold L. Wolman, George Galster and Royce Hanson
Additional contact information
Andrea Sarzynski: George Washington Institute of Public Policy, George Washington University, 802 21st Street NW, Suite 602, Washington, DC 20052, USA. apsarzyn@ gwu.edu; hwolman@gwu.edu
Harold L. Wolman: George Washington Institute of Public Policy, George Washington University, 802 21st Street NW, Suite 602, Washington, DC 20052, USA. hwolman@gwu.edu
George Galster: College of Urban, Labor and Metropolitan Affairs, Wayne State University, Detroit, MI 48202, USA. aa3571@wayne.edu
Royce Hanson: George Washington Institute of Public Policy, George Washington University, 802 21st Street NW, Suite 602, Washington, DC 20052, USA. rhanson@gwu.edu

Urban Studies, 2006, vol. 43, issue 3, 601-626

Abstract: The paper explores relationships between seven dimensions of land use in 1990 and subsequent levels of three traffic congestion outcomes in 2000 for a sample of 50 large US urban areas. Multiple regression models are developed to address several methodological concerns, including reverse causation and time-lags. Controlling for prior levels of congestion and changes in an urban area's transport network and relevant demographics, it is found that: density/ continuity is positively related to subsequent roadway ADT/lane and delay per capita; housing centrality is positively related to subsequent delay per capita; and housing-job proximity is inversely related to subsequent commute time. Only the last result corresponds to the conventional wisdom that more compact metropolitan land use patterns reduce traffic congestion. These results prove two points: that the choice of congestion measure may substantively affect the results; and that multivariate statistical analyses are necessary to control for potentially confounding influences, such as population growth and investment in the transport network.

Date: 2006
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (11)

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/00420980500452441 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:43:y:2006:i:3:p:601-626

DOI: 10.1080/00420980500452441

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().

 
Page updated 2025-03-19
Handle: RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:43:y:2006:i:3:p:601-626