Are Residents Willing to Pay for their Community Forests? Results of a Contingent Valuation Survey in Missouri, USA
Thomas Treiman and
Additional contact information
Thomas Treiman: Missouri Department of Conservation Resource Science, 1110 College Avenue, Columbia, Missouri 65201, USA, firstname.lastname@example.org
Justine Gartner: Missouri Department of Conservation Resource Science, 1110 College Avenue, Columbia, Missouri 65201, USA, email@example.com
Urban Studies, 2006, vol. 43, issue 9, 1537-1547
Publicly owned trees have important environmental and amenity values contributing to the quality of urban life. Community officials charged with managing this resource face a lack of funding and underestimate the value that residents place on street trees. A survey of residents in 44 Missouri, USA, communities included a contingent valuation method item designed to estimate how residents' willingness-to-pay for improved tree care and maintenance varied with community size and location. Residents in communities with a population of 50 000 or more, in the St Louis and Kansas City suburbs, and in St Louis and Kansas City show strong support for a ballot issue establishing a tree fund supported by a tax of between $14 and $16 per household per year. The results of this survey, together with recent surveys of community forestry officials and street tree inventories, are used to make recommendations to state agencies charged with managing community forests.
References: Add references at CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (1) Track citations by RSS feed
Downloads: (external link)
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:43:y:2006:i:9:p:1537-1547
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().