Building Social Capital in Hong Kong by Institutionalising Participation: Potential and Limitations

Sam Wong
Additional contact information
Sam Wong: School of Earth and Environment, University of Leeds, Environment Building, Leeds, LS2 9JT, UK, s.wong@leeds.ac.uk

Urban Studies, 2008, vol. 45, issue 7, 1413-1437

Abstract: This paper draws on ethnographic research in Hong Kong to question the effectiveness of Elinor Ostrom's `design principles' in providing solutions to social divisions by social capital building and institutionalised participation. It challenges the strategic and instrumental assumptions of human motivations for not adequately considering moral concerns, a sense of commitment and the right way of doing things in social cooperation. The tendency to formalise the process of participation, by authority building, rule enforcement and threat of sanction, plays down the role of informal institutions in mediating modes of interactions. The practices of good governance can undermine the already-limited social capital of poor people. This paper concludes by offering the `agency—institutions—structures' framework in analysing social capital.

Date: 2008
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098008090681 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:45:y:2008:i:7:p:1413-1437

DOI: 10.1177/0042098008090681

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().