Asset Value Enhancement of Singapore’s Public Housing Main Upgrading Programme (MUP) Policy: A Real Option Analysis Approach
Kim Hin Ho,
Eddie Chi-man Hui and
Muhammad Faishal Bin Ibrahim
Additional contact information
Eddie Chi-man Hui: Department of Building and Real Estate, Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hung Hom, Kowloon, 852, Hong Kong, bscmhui@inet.polyu.edu.hk
Muhammad Faishal Bin Ibrahim: Department of Real Estate, National University of Singapore, 4 Architecture Drive, 117566, Singapore, rstmfi@nus.edu.sg
Urban Studies, 2009, vol. 46, issue 11, 2329-2361
Abstract:
The main upgrading programme (MUP) is a major policy implemented by the Singapore Housing Development Board (HDB) since the 1990s. This heavily subsidised policy is highly targeted in order to enhance the social and economic value of public housing in Singapore. It benefits HDB households residing in the older HDB housing estates in terms of both an enhanced asset value of the household’s flat and a quality living environment. An HDB flat owner whose precinct is selected for upgrading under the MUP policy is envisaged to be holding a call option to upgrade his flat, as this option to upgrade is valuable and it has an opportunity to command a higher price in the HDB resale market. This paper estimates the option premiums for upgrading by utilising the intuitive and explicit numerical method solution of the binomial real option pricing model and the Samuelson—McKean closed-form solution. The embedded real option premiums under the MUP policy are estimated at S$10 300 and S$2 000 for the popular three-room HDB flat and four-room HDB flat respectively. It is also found that government subsidies have a significant impact on the option premiums.
Date: 2009
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations: View citations in EconPapers (4)
Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098009342451 (text/html)
Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.
Export reference: BibTeX
RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan)
HTML/Text
Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:46:y:2009:i:11:p:2329-2361
DOI: 10.1177/0042098009342451
Access Statistics for this article
More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().