Institutions in Theories of Land Markets: Illustrated by the Dutch Market for Agricultural Land

Barrie Needham, Arno Segeren and Edwin Buitelaar
Additional contact information
Barrie Needham: School of Management, Radboud University, Nijmegen, PO Box 9108, Nijmegen 6500 HK, The Netherlands, b.needham@fm.ru.nl
Arno Segeren: Netherlands Institute for Spatial Research and is now at the Municipality of the Hague, arno.segeren@dso.denhaag.nl
Edwin Buitelaar: Netherlands Environmental Assessment Agency, Oranjebuitensingel 6, The Hague, 2511VE, The Netherlands, edwin.buitelaar@pbl.nl

Urban Studies, 2011, vol. 48, issue 1, 161-176

Abstract: Theories of land markets should be intellectually sound and should be able to explain and predict market outcomes, such as price and volume of transactions, changes in these and locations of different land uses. Theories based on neo-classical economics, which largely ignore the role of institutions, are not intellectually sound because it is known that markets cannot work without institutions. Nor do these theories predict outcomes satisfactorily. Moreover, they assume market mechanisms and do not investigate them critically. This paper explores how institutions may be taken into account in theories of land markets and whether that leads to better theories both of market outcomes and of market processes. New institutional economics provides the tools to investigate how the interactions between market actors are influenced by institutions. And the ‘old’ institutional economics emphasises how institutions influence the motivations and preferences of those actors. The conclusion is that there cannot be a general theory of land markets, only theories with a limited applicability and scope. Such theories can be used to explain the effects of small changes and to predict the effects of marginal changes in institutions. In that latter use, these theories can be used for designing land policy. How institutions can be incorporated into theory is illustrated by analysing the Dutch market for agricultural land. This shows how institutions affect the outcomes in that market and the consequences for the transformation of land from agriculture to urban use.

Date: 2011
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098009360682 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:48:y:2011:i:1:p:161-176

DOI: 10.1177/0042098009360682

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().