Extending the analysis of urban land conflict: An example from Johannesburg

Colin Marx

Urban Studies, 2016, vol. 53, issue 13, 2779-2795

Abstract: Social conflict can be mobilised to achieve progressive and/or regressive change. Focusing on urban land conflicts that relate to property rights, I examine how commonly held understandings of this phenomenon may risk glossing over conflict that emerges because of the property rights themselves, as well as legitimating only certain types of conflict as worthy of activism and scholarly engagement. Using the example of Thokoza, a largely residential area outside of Johannesburg, I juxtapose an understanding of conflict as being related to ‘distributional’ inequalities with that of conflict emerging from the inherent nature of property rights. This illustrates the complementary value of thinking about conflict caused by property rights themselves in analysing urban land conflicts.

Keywords: property rights; South Africa; urban development; urban land conflict (search for similar items in EconPapers)
Date: 2016
References: View references in EconPapers View complete reference list from CitEc
Citations:

Downloads: (external link)
https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0042098015607801 (text/html)

Related works:
This item may be available elsewhere in EconPapers: Search for items with the same title.

Export reference: BibTeX RIS (EndNote, ProCite, RefMan) HTML/Text

Persistent link: https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:sae:urbstu:v:53:y:2016:i:13:p:2779-2795

DOI: 10.1177/0042098015607801

Access Statistics for this article

More articles in Urban Studies from Urban Studies Journal Limited
Bibliographic data for series maintained by SAGE Publications ().